2nd Amendment

The 2nd Amendment is under attack

by The Baltimore Sun  |  published on January 19, 2013

The Second Amendment is under attack. This amendment is so important, so crucial to the liberties of the people, that the Founding Fathers placed it second only to the first; that which guaranteed the five most basic of freedoms. We’ve moved away from treating this right as a right.

We wink when we speak of guarding against tyranny, we collude when we mention hunters and sportsmen, and we ignore the individuals that exercise this right countless times a month to preserve their personal right to liberty and perhaps life. Make no mistake; the right of the people to keep and bear arms is the only provision that prevents a corrupt state from enacting more drastic infringements on the rest of the Bill of Rights.

Because of this, all discussions of restrictions should start with the recognition of just how paramount this right is. All enacted restrictions should therefore meet an extraordinarily high burden of clear, evidence-based benefit, while simultaneously recognizing the danger of restricting the rights of every single American.

Gun control advocates are proffering the same restrictions, the same ideas, and the same justifications to achieve their goal; that goal being not to minimize gun violence, but instead remove guns completely from the hands of the citizens. And if outright prohibition isn’t possible, to dilute the right so fully that it loses all resemblance to the Second Amendment.

Unlike the media’s strategy, this is not meant to be sensationalist but instead is the only conclusion that can be drawn from statements made by the Brady Campaign, Attorney General Eric Holder, Senator Diane Feinstein, and many others that lead the call for stronger gun control. This is important because national tragedies such as Newtown, Aurora and Virginia Tech are being used as platforms, as justifications for restriction, when these proposed restrictions would do nearly nothing to prevent future like tragedies from occurring.

Take for example, magazine restrictions. This restriction is mentioned repeatedly and sold by common media outlets and gun control advocates as a common-sense approach to reducing casualties. This specific restriction has been demonstrated in many ways to be practically ineffective. The Virginia Tech shooter used two handguns (the Glock 193 having a magazine capacity of 15 rounds) and reloaded countless times during the massacre. A panel, which consisted of members of Virginia’s governor’s office and representatives of Virginia Tech, concluded that 10-round magazines that were legal would have not made much difference in the incident.

No comments yet - you can be the first!

Comments are closed.

?>

All Things Gun Related

Whether you’re into AR-15s, AKs, carbines, shotguns, self-defense pistols, or hunting rifles, American Firearms Review will provide you with the most up to date product reviews, news, and everything else you need to know about firearms and accessories. Join over 1,000,000 avid gun owners who trust American Firearm Review for their daily dose of Second Amendment news and reviews.

We know how important your privacy is and your information is SAFE with us. We’ll never sell
your email address and you can unsubscribe at any time directly from your inbox.
View our full privacy policy.